6th Annual DCL-CIDM Survey Highlights Need to Better Future-Proof Content

FRESH MEADOWS, N.Y., April 3, 2018 /PRNewswire/ — In an annual content trends survey fielded by DCL and the Center for Information Development Management (CIDM), 48 percent of respondents said that their content was not ready to support their plans for the future. Last year that number was 51 percent, which is minimal progress. The survey responses make clear that content is recognized as a high-value asset for many organizations, so why then is so much of it locked in formats resistant to the level of analysis and number of delivery platforms available in today’s “big data” world? 

“Following the Trends – Is Your Content Ready?”, is the sixth annual survey from DCL and CIDM. Each year this survey gives professionals the opportunity to weigh in on the subject of content – delivery methods, management, formats, and more. After six years, the one trend that remains consistent is that organizations are creating a lot of content, but do not have the time or resources to future-proof it. When asked, “What are the shortcomings of your content as it exists today?” 65 percent answered, “search capability needs improvements”. The question, “How do you deliver content today?” resulted in 71 percent of respondents saying they still deliver their content in PDF format. This is down slightly from 2017 when 74 percent said PDFs were their format of choice. When asked, “What is your mobile device strategy?” – 36 percent said they have “no current mobile strategy.”  2017’s results for the same question showed this number to be 38 percent.

“The survey shows that content developers are aware of their customer needs and know where their information falls short in meeting those needs. However, they often don’t know where to start to make improvements – What will make the most impact? What is the most cost-effective? What can they do with the resources they have available today?” said Dawn Stevens, President of Comtech Services and Director of The Center for Information-Development Management (CIDM).

The reasons behind this lack of progress are revealed, as well. 71 percent of respondents said “insufficient staff time” was the main barrier in trying to get their content ready for the future. “Insufficient budget” (57 percent), “inadequate tools” (49 percent), and “content not designed or written appropriately” (49 percent) rounded out the top obstacles in getting content prepared for the future.

“Change is hard, which I think explains why so little has changed this year from last year. While most respondents agree they need to better structure content to meet future needs, most have not done much about it,” said Mark Gross, President of DCL. “I think the key response is lack of staff time, and for good reason – most organizations run quite lean these days, barely keeping up with day to day work. Taking on an “important” major project often takes second place to the “urgent” project. One take away from this this survey is that organizations need to be very deliberate in organizing resources, both internal and external, to build for their future.”

While some responses feed the narrative that most organizations are behind in getting their content ready, there are also signs that they are planning to improve. For instance, to the question “How do you expect your content strategy to change in the next two to three years?”, respondents noted: “Improve mobile device support” (56 percent), “provide dynamic delivery system” (41 percent), “change authoring environment” (37 percent), and “restructure content to be topic-based” (33 percent).

The majority of respondents were “Writer/Information Developer/Content Developer” (55 percent), “Manager/Executive/Owner” (39 percent) and “Information Architects (31 percent)”, along with other titles. More than half of respondents answered that they were in the “technology” industry.

See 2018’s full survey results here.

About Data Conversion Laboratory, Inc. (DCL)

Data Conversion Laboratory, Inc. (DCL) (dclab.com) has been helping organizations transform their content to smarter formats for over 35 years. DCL’s services include automating XML & HTML conversion, metadata enrichment and web scraping using the latest innovations in machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) technology. DCL helps organize content for modern technologies and platforms.

About the Center for Information-Development Management (CIDM)

The Center for Information-Development Management (CIDM) brings together the most highly skilled and talented managers in the field of information development from across the US and internationally to facilitate the sharing of information about current trends, best practices, and developments within the industry, from information development to training and support.

Contact: Ariane Doud, Warner Communications, (978) 283-2674, 192676@email4pr.com

Cision View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/6th-annual-dcl-cidm-survey-highlights-need-to-better-future-proof-content-300622732.html

SOURCE Data Conversion Laboratory

Artificial Intelligence News

  • NLG in the newsroom: fast, consistent, and hyperlocal

    NLG in the newsroom: fast, consistent, and hyperlocal We’ve written about how Natural Language Generation can eliminate the bottleneck of manual, one-at-a-time analysis within business environments, producing data-driven insights that otherwise would remain fossilized in spreadsheets on the network drive. It is also worth noting that the same principles apply…(read more...)

  • Twilio: Harnessing The Power Of AI (Artificial Intelligence)

    Twilio, a provider of voice, video and messaging services, reported its second quarter results and they were certainly standout. Revenues spiked by 86% to $275 million and there was a profit of 2 cents a share. On the earnings call, CEO Jeff Lawson noted: “We have the opportunity to change…(read more...)

  • Artificial Intelligence Search, NLP & Automation

    Another significant requirement is the need to find an efficient method for reducing the amount of computational searching for a match or a solution. Considerable important work has been done on the problem of pruning a search space without affecting the result of the search. One technique is to compare…(read more...)


Comments are closed.